Elevidys’ Age-Restricted Indication Not Negotiable, CBER’s Peter Marks Told Sarepta
Executive Summary
FDA team held several internal meetings on the gene therapy after the 12 May advisory committee, culminating in a teleconference with Sarepta in which the CBER director outlined his accelerated approval decision and reiterated recommendations to modify the ongoing EMBARK trial to better ensure confirmation of benefit. Pink Sheet's Drug Review Profile dives into the story behind the Elevidys review.
You may also be interested in...
FDA’s Pepaxto Decider: Peter Marks To Handle Oncopeptides’ Appeal Of Accelerated Approval Withdrawal
CBER director will decide whether the multiple myeloma drug should be withdrawn under new expedited withdrawal procedures; it's the third time FDA leaders have asked senior officials in the biologics center to help decide the fate of a CDER-regulated accelerated approval drug.
Let’s Go To The Video: Recordings Of DMD Patients After Elevidys Treatment ‘Compelling’ But Not Substantial Evidence
CBER Director Peter Marks urged the review teams for Sarepta’s gene therapy to consider pre- and post-treatment videos showing improved physical function, but clinical and statistical reviewers cited limitations in the patient videos and said they failed to inform whether micro-dystrophin is a suitable surrogate endpoint for accelerated approval.
Let’s Go To The Video: Recordings Of DMD Patients After Elevidys Treatment ‘Compelling’ But Not Substantial Evidence
CBER Director Peter Marks urged the review teams for Sarepta’s gene therapy to consider pre- and post-treatment videos showing improved physical function, but clinical and statistical reviewers cited limitations in the patient videos and said they failed to inform whether micro-dystrophin is a suitable surrogate endpoint for accelerated approval.