Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Slim Adcomm Majority Boosts Sarepta’s Gene Therapy In Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Executive Summary

Accelerated approval seems imminent after a majority of the US FDA’s Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee voted the risk-benefit balance supported it.

You may also be interested in...



Let’s Go To The Video: Recordings Of DMD Patients After Elevidys Treatment ‘Compelling’ But Not Substantial Evidence

CBER Director Peter Marks urged the review teams for Sarepta’s gene therapy to consider pre- and post-treatment videos showing improved physical function, but clinical and statistical reviewers cited limitations in the patient videos and said they failed to inform whether micro-dystrophin is a suitable surrogate endpoint for accelerated approval.

Elevidys’ Age-Restricted Indication Not Negotiable, CBER’s Peter Marks Told Sarepta

FDA team held several internal meetings on the gene therapy after the 12 May advisory committee, culminating in a teleconference with Sarepta in which the CBER director outlined his accelerated approval decision and reiterated recommendations to modify the ongoing EMBARK trial to better ensure confirmation of benefit. Pink Sheet's Drug Review Profile dives into the story behind the Elevidys review.

US FDA Center Directors Should Not Influence Adcomm Votes Or Overrule Scientific Staff, Coalition Says

In a letter to Commissioner Robert Califf, the Patient, Consumer and Public Health Coalition says medical product center directors and other senior staff should refrain from trying to sway advisory committee votes and be reminded that overruling decisions of their own scientific staff undermines the public trust.

Related Content

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS148208

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel