Orphan Drug Exclusivity: In Narrow Application Of Catalyst Ruling, FDA Retains Its Existing Regs
Executive Summary
US FDA will continue to tie orphan exclusivity to uses or indications for which the drug was approved. Attorneys say this buys agency time to sort out complex policy and legal questions and continue to seek legislative fix. Additional litigation is also possible, as happened in Depomed case.
You may also be interested in...
FDA Staff ‘Literally’ Up At Night Deciding 3-Year Exclusivity Requests
More sponsors are submitting applications around the same time requiring the agency to make complicated decisions about exclusivity and whether approval of subsequent applications is barred, FDA attorney says.
Jazz Disputes FDA’s Approval Of Lumryz Over Xywav’s Orphan Exclusivity, Citing Lack Of Comparative Study
Lawsuit argues FDA wrongly determined that Avadel’s Lumryz is ‘clinically superior’ to Xywav because of once-nightly dosing. FDA’s Division of Neurology revised its initial opinion based on views of CDHR’s sleep team and additional input from the agency’s orphan drug office.
Senate Committee Passes Moderate PBM Reform, But Has Its Eyes On Stronger Policies
Delinking pharmacy benefits managers’ compensation from the prices of drugs received bipartisan rhetorical support at a HELP markup, but the panel only cleared less drastic PBM reforms along with generic and orphan-drug focused policies. Approved amendments tackled step therapy, pharma transparency and PBM gag clauses, among other topics.