FDA Grants Gralise Orphan Exclusivity But Rejects Policy Change
This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet Daily
Executive Summary
FDA bows to a court ruling requiring it to award orphan drug market exclusivity to Depomed’s gabapentin, but the agency says it will continue to require the sponsor of a drug that is the “same” as a previously approved drug to show that it is “clinically superior” in order to be eligible.
You may also be interested in...
Jazz Disputes FDA’s Approval Of Lumryz Over Xywav’s Orphan Exclusivity, Citing Lack Of Comparative Study
Lawsuit argues FDA wrongly determined that Avadel’s Lumryz is ‘clinically superior’ to Xywav because of once-nightly dosing. FDA’s Division of Neurology revised its initial opinion based on views of CDHR’s sleep team and additional input from the agency’s orphan drug office.
Orphan Drug Exclusivity: In Narrow Application Of Catalyst Ruling, FDA Retains Its Existing Regs
US FDA will continue to tie orphan exclusivity to uses or indications for which the drug was approved. Attorneys say this buys agency time to sort out complex policy and legal questions and continue to seek legislative fix. Additional litigation is also possible, as happened in Depomed case.
Eagle Will Be Last Firm To Bypass FDA's Orphan Drug Exclusivity Requirement
Court orders US FDA to award Bendeka seven years of exclusivity without requiring clinical superiority test; law codifying FDA policy passed prior to suit and is not retroactive.