Whistleblower Management: Rogue FDA Reviewer Sets Tone to Start Avandia Committee; Forgotten By End
This article was originally published in RPM Report
Avandia has been a contentious topic for FDA for six years. The latest advisory committee review highlights how far the agency has come in handling dissent – but also underscores the impact that a lone voice can have on delaying reviews, and prompting damaging headlines.
You may also be interested in...
FDA is working on a guidance for meta-analysis to support safety reviews, and it clearly hopes to have an impact beyond the walls of White Oak.
A re-adjudication of cardiovascular events in the RECORD trial reassured members of a June 5-6 advisory committee that the study findings are reliable, but did not erase uncertainties about CV risk associated with rosiglitazone.
With bigger clinical trials come potentially bigger problems. That, at least, is what sponsors of 15,000-plus trials in cardiovascular medicine are finding out. J&J/Bayer’s experience in late May with Xarelto for acute coronary syndrome is a case in point—and it also provides timely context for the surprising setback for another CV project, Pfizer/BMS' Eliquis.