The Avastin Docket: Few Comments, But Lots of Questions About Implications
This article was originally published in RPM Report
The public docket on FDA’s reconsideration of the approval of Avastin for breast cancer has only gathered a few dozen responses. Those submissions overwhelming favor retaining the indication, but also raise some broader questions about the standards for accelerated approval in oncology.
You may also be interested in...
The two-day “streamlined withdrawal” hearing for Genentech’s breast cancer indication for Avastin was an unprecedented regulatory event. Based on how badly it went for the sponsor—and how uncomfortable it was for FDA—there may not be too many imitators any time soon.
The June hearing on the status of Genentech’s metastatic breast cancer indication for Avastin will focus on a long list of substantive disagreements about the data. But any sponsor interested in the future of the accelerated approval process should study the back-and-forth in the hearing process itself.
New efforts by US payors suggest oncologics no longer enjoy the same protected reimbursement status they once did, potentially pulling the rug from under biopharma's hottest development, dealmaking, and revenue generating activities. To succeed in an increasingly competitive marketplace, biopharmas must adapt their strategies with an eye to reducing payors' overall costs.