Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


FDA's Avastin Breast Cancer Withdrawal Sets New Standard, Deters Drug Development

This article was originally published in RPM Report

Executive Summary

FDA’s proposal to withdraw the approval of Avastin for MBC is based on a new standard for the efficacy showing that a therapy must make in first-line MBC. The Agency previously -- and appropriately -- followed a more flexible approach based on data showing a medicine’s effect on PFS [progression-free survival] or other disease progression endpoints, together with data on OS [overall survival].

You may also be interested in...

Trailblazer Sandra Horning Is Helping Companies Break New Ground

Roche’s former chief medical officer has new career as board member to three companies, including COVID-19 vaccine pioneer Moderna, and is co-founder of a startup seeking to develop more affordable drugs. She helped pave the way for FDA’s breakthrough therapy designation and diversification of Genentech’s clinical trials.

Never Again? Why the Avastin Hearing May Be One of a Kind

The two-day “streamlined withdrawal” hearing for Genentech’s breast cancer indication for Avastin was an unprecedented regulatory event. Based on how badly it went for the sponsor—and how uncomfortable it was for FDA—there may not be too many imitators any time soon.

Accelerated Withdrawal in Action: The Avastin Hearing Process

The June hearing on the status of Genentech’s metastatic breast cancer indication for Avastin will focus on a long list of substantive disagreements about the data. But any sponsor interested in the future of the accelerated approval process should study the back-and-forth in the hearing process itself.

Related Content


Latest Headlines
See All



Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts