Accelerated Approval: Sponsor Size No Excuse For Confirmatory Trial Delays, FDA Says
There is a greater commitment among larger, well-capitalized oncology companies to complete confirmatory trials, Oncology Center of Excellence Director Richard Pazdur says; smaller company approach of first getting accelerated approval and then using commercial proceeds to capitalize confirmatory trial is ‘unacceptable.’
You may also be interested in...
Pazdur On Accelerated Approval: FDA Needs To Explain Why It Does Not Always Seek Withdrawal When Trials Fail
Knee-jerk reaction when a confirmatory trial fails is that the drug should be withdrawn, but the agency must undertake a more nuanced evaluation and do a better job explaining it to the public, OCE Director Richard Pazdur says; Pazdur and Project Confirm lead Gautam Mehta spoke with the Pink Sheet about dangling indications, FDORA reforms and the withdrawal process.
Confirmatory Trials: Comprehensive Development Plan, Early Communication Will Help Reduce Delays, US FDA Says
Accelerated approval sponsors who want to demonstrate due diligence in conducting confirmatory trials should bring a comprehensive program for verifying benefit to the agency early and be proactive in communicating about challenges that could lead to delays, FDA’s oncology review staff say at an adcomm on delayed trials for Acrotech’s lymphoma drugs.
Seven-year timeline for Phase III trial in first-line peripheral T-cell lymphoma is too long, advisory committee members say, also questioning study feasibility; some panelists favor Richard Pazdur’s push for a second, concurrent trial in the relapsed/refractory setting that could read out sooner.