‘Poor Quality’ Submission: CellTrans’ Lantidra BLA Marked By Missing And Incongruent Data
Executive Summary
FDA's review of documents and source data files to assess product efficacy and subject safety was complicated by missing and inconsistent data, the clinical reviewer said, concluding there was insufficient data monitoring during clinical studies or in preparing the documents for regulatory submission.
You may also be interested in...
Lantidra Chronology: 19 Years From IND Submission To Approval For The Cellular Therapy
Pink Sheet’s Drug Review Profile looks at the timeline behind the development and FDA review of CellTrans’ treatment for type 1 diabetes.
BrainStorm’s NurOwn Gets Many, Many Thumbs Down From US FDA Panel
In overwhelmingly concluding that efficacy has not been demonstrated for the mesenchymal stromal cell therapy, panelists went beyond just the failed Phase III trial and cited BrainStorm’s ‘statistical magic’ and failure to adequately describe the mechanism of action, as well as safety and product quality concerns.
NurOwn Adcomm Is 20 Members Strong Despite US FDA’s ‘Struggle’ To Find Unconflicted Neurology Experts
Seven panelists are regular members of the Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies advisory committee, while many of the 13 temporary voting members bring neurology and neuroscience expertise. In a conflict-of-interest waiver, the agency noted a struggle to find experts in clinical neurology and neurodegenerative diseases who lack disqualifying financial interests.