Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

US FDA External Controls Guidance Does Little To Advance The Cause, Especially In Rare Diseases – Comments

Executive Summary

Industry and patient groups take issue with draft guidance’s skeptical tone on utility and reliability of externally controlled studies, with some saying the guidance ignores special considerations inherent in studying rare diseases. Recommendations on access to patient-level data for external control arms also are problematic and likely infeasible, stakeholders say.

You may also be interested in...



US FDA’s External Controls Guidance Should Include Hybrid Designs, Experts Say

Also, FDA audits of vendors who curate and de-identify data could be a way of establishing data provenance without providing access to original patient records, which could trigger consent and privacy issues, experts said during a roundtable sponsored by the Clinical Research Data Sharing Alliance.

Sarepta’s External Controls Analysis Weakened By Elevidys Placebo Data Comparison

When placebo data from the only randomized trial of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene therapy were compared with Sarepta’s proffered external control data, the placebo subjects numerically outperformed the external controls, ‘calling into question the comparability of the external control group,’ an FDA statistical reviewer said.

External Controls: FDA Guidance Provides Clarity But Does Little To Remove Hurdles

Agency discourages use of externally controlled trials in all but a very limited number of situations truly ripe for such an approach; new draft guidance discusses at length the various confounding factors that can introduce bias into a comparison between an investigational treatment and an external control using either real-world data or data from another clinical trial.

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS148388

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel