After Xtandi, Will Government Ever Seek March-In Rights Over Drug Pricing?
Executive Summary
Market availability of Xtandi, not its cost, is the issue, NIH says in denying petition for government to invoke march-in rights to patents on the prostate cancer drug. But Biden administration makes two other same-day moves that could leave march-in advocates with some hope.
You may also be interested in...
Xtandi Still Faces Likely US Price Cut Even As It Avoids ‘March In’ Proceeding
The Biden administration decision not to pursue ‘march in’ proceedings for Pfizer/Astellas’ Xtandi sounds like good news. The reality is that the prostate cancer therapy is likely to face a more certain federal pricing intervention in the first year of the new Medicare ‘negotiation’ process.
Moderna CEO Reminds People About Value Of Government Negotiations At Senate Hearing
Stéphane Bancel also gave conflicting answers for how the company set the cost of its mRNA COVID-19 vaccine as Democratic lawmakers tried to berate Moderna for its coming price hikes. Republicans lawmakers argue against retroactive shaming, saying that if the government wanted to set the eventual commercial price, it should have done that early in negotiations.
Lilly’s Insulin Cost Cutting Plan: Replacing Rebates With Cost Sharing Help At Point Of Sale
Biden Administration praises Lilly for latest moves to improve affordability of insulin in private market and calls for other sponsors to follow suit. Lilly’s plan is also tactical, as manufacturers of highly-rebated drugs with serial price hikes face an increased rebate liability in Medicaid next year.