Supreme Court Seems To Support Government’s Later Dismissal Of False Claims Act Cases
Executive Summary
Justices cite changing circumstances, constitutional concerns in preventing government from seeking dismissal of a case in which it initially declined to intervene. They also question whether government should intervene before moving to dismiss.
You may also be interested in...
Supreme Court Gives Government Leeway To Dismiss False Claims Act Suits
Government can file a motion to dismiss an FCA case whenever it intervenes, whether it does so during the seal period or later, court says. District courts should assess motion to dismiss using rules in civil litigation.
False Claims Act Liability: Defendant’s Belief Claims Were False Matters, Supreme Court Finds
In unanimous decision, court backs whistleblowers’ fraud theory that SuperValu and Safeway defrauded Medicare and Medicaid by reporting higher retail prices than their discounted prices. BIO, AdvaMed and MIWG submitted amicus brief in support of the retail pharmacies.
Pharma Could Face Fewer False Claims Act Suits If Supreme Court Concurs With Government
High court is to determine whether the government can dismiss an FCA complaint after initially declining to take it on. In recent years, the government has dismissed numerous qui tam suits against pharma companies in which it did not intervene.