EFPIA laments 'unfortunate' WHO decision on Lucentis
This article was originally published in SRA
The World Health Organization's "unprecedented" decision not to put Novartis's Lucentis on its essential medicines list (EML) for wet AMD, while retaining an unlicensed drug (Roche's Avastin) on the list, sends out a "very unfortunate signal" to industry and regulators, says Richard Bergström, director general of the European industry federation EFPIA.
You may also be interested in...
In the latest development in the long-running case pitting Novartis and Roche against the Italian competition authority over a fine imposed in 2014, the Court of Justice of the EU has confirmed that the firms’ arrangement over Avastin and Lucentis could constitute a serious restriction on competition if it involved the dissemination of misleading information. The case now goes back to the Italian court.
Regulatory bodies from Australia, Canada and the UK say a new pilot program will reduce the need for multiple inspections of the same site, while an MoU signed by Australia and Canada will cut the amount of documentary evidence required from drug sponsors seeking GMP clearances.
An explicit ban on patent linkage would ensure that competition to originator drugs is not delayed, according to off-patent industry group Medicines for Europe.