Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


Setting the Stage: Qnexa and the Power of REMS

This article was originally published in RPM Report

Executive Summary

Vivus’ second trip to an advisory panel was a much happier one, with the company’s weight loss therapy garnering an overwhelming “yes” vote on approvability. The key change? A Risk Evaluation & Mitigation Strategy that will be precedent setting if approved—and that demonstrates the power of REMS even if FDA moves in a different direction with this application.

You may also be interested in...

Obesity Therapy Gap Or Regulatory Gap? REMS Not The Answer For Belviq Or GW Group

A common theme in FDA’s review of three different weight loss drugs has been discussion of whether a Risk Evaluation & Mitigation Strategy program can help assure appropriate use of the therapies. FDA clearly thinks the answer is “no.” But that doesn’t end the discussion of what tools can be used to help curb off-label use.

FDAAA Impact Analysis (Year 4): The REMS Retreat Continues, But For How Long?

As the fifth year of the REMS era begins, FDA is imposing mandatory programs less frequently than it did even in the first year after the law creating formal risk management plans took effect. But there are some new trends to watch, including the evolution of REMS classes and the emergence of products with REMS-in-waiting.

Mis-Reading the Minutes: Arena Approval Follows Sell-Off Based on Advisory Committee Summary

Arena received great news June 27: approval of the weight loss therapy Belviq with a very clean label and no special marketing restrictions. That was what Wall Street expected—except when investors read the summary of the advisory committee review of the drug published by FDA on June 22.

Related Content


Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All



Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts