Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


Another Vote for Accelerated Approval

This article was originally published in RPM Report

Executive Summary

The Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee review of ApoPharma’s Ferriprox was not one of the highest profile meetings of the past year. But for sponsors concerned about the availability of the accelerated approval pathway, it was a very important event.

You may also be interested in...

Shire’s Replagal Withdrawn: A “Non-Traditional” Review Ends Badly

Shire’s decision to take its Fabry Disease therapy and go home sets up two possible narratives. One accentuates FDA’s apparent inflexibility and is sure to reinforce calls for legislative changes to the approval standard. The other highlights a recalcitrant or even petulant-sounding sponsor. Neither is likely to sound good to Fabry’s patients.

Never Again? Why the Avastin Hearing May Be One of a Kind

The two-day “streamlined withdrawal” hearing for Genentech’s breast cancer indication for Avastin was an unprecedented regulatory event. Based on how badly it went for the sponsor—and how uncomfortable it was for FDA—there may not be too many imitators any time soon.

Translating FDA for Investors: Seattle Genetics Shrugs Off Public Lambasting at ODAC

Actions speak louder than words. That, at least, is how Seattle Genetics urged investors to think about a tongue lashing the company received during an advisory committee review of the cancer agent Adcetris Seattle Genetics may be right on two levels: the practical outcome of the meeting was positive, and the FDA rhetoric may not have been as directly aimed at the sponsor as a warning to all oncology drug developers.


Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All



Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts