PDUFA VI “Breakthrough” Fee Unlikely; FDA Wants Fewer Obligations, Not New Metrics
This article was originally published in RPM Report
Executive Summary
FDA Office of New Drugs Director John Jenkins is making a case against adding “Breakthrough” user fees to PDUFA VI to better fund the program and cut back on the number of unqualified requests for designation. Rather than seek additional funding for specific programs, FDA wants fewer obligations under the user fee program; the agency is pushing back against industry proposals to add more formal meetings.
You may also be interested in...
PDUFA VI: Innovative Trial Design Talks Can’t Have Formal Meeting Goals, FDA Says
FDA tells industry that proposal on trials also can’t use SPA-like process.
FDA’s “Breakthrough” Exceeds Expectations; Will It Break The Bank?
Drug sponsors are eager to use FDA’s new “breakthrough” therapy development pathway, and the agency is granting designations at a much faster rate than originally expected. But the “all hands on deck” approach required by FDA officials for breakthrough is resource-intensive at a time when the budget sequestration is preventing the agency from accessing all its available user fee funding. Is the popular program at risk?
US FDA Commissioner Pushes Real-World Evidence To Guide Use Of Alzheimer’s, Obesity Drugs
‘We’ve got these enormous markets,’ Rob Califf says. ‘Should 65% of the US population be treated with obesity drugs?’