Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


FDA Would Establish Conditions for Swift Manufacturing Changes

This article was originally published in The Gold Sheet

Executive Summary

FDA draft 'conditions established' guidance proposes to smooth the way for continual improvement of manufacturing processes for drugs and biologics by saying which manufacturing changes don't need to be reported.

You may also be interested in...

Why ‘Established Conditions’ CMC Approach Could Generate More Supporting Information, Not Less

The ‘established conditions’ concept enshrined in the ICH Q12 draft guideline was the US FDA’s answer to the background information that has cluttered new drug applications in the quality-by-design era. But early indications are that it will amass information clutter of its own.

FDA Launches Pilot To Gain Practical Experience With 'Established Conditions' In Quality Assessments

FDA is accepting applications from the pharmaceutical industry to pilot the use of established conditions proposed by sponsors in NDAs, ANDAS, BLAs and supplements. The purpose of the pilot is for FDA to gain practical experience in assessing proposed established conditions and to ensure that assessment decisions do not negatively impact user fee time frames.

Pharmaceutical Industry Slams FDA’s Guidance On Drug Substance Post- Approval Changes; Say More Alignment With ICH Needed

Like the fabled Rip Van Winkle, FDA guidance on post-approval changes for drug substances has awakened after a long nap to a changed world. Industry is urging FDA to revise its draft in a way that’s less prescriptive and more in line with the science- and risk-based approaches, outlined in ICH Q8, Q9 and Q12 guidelines, that have emerged in the years after the agency withdrew its BACPAC guidance.

Related Content


Latest Headlines
See All



Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts