Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

CHESE-POND's SEEKING RISE IN FLUORIDE LIMIT TO 1,500 PPM

Executive Summary

CHESE-POND's SEEKING RISE IN FLUORIDE LIMIT TO 1,500 PPM, up from the 850 to 1,150 parts per million currently proposed by FDA in the anticaries OTC tentative final monograph (TFM) issued June 15, 1988. In a Feb. 13 letter to FDA, the company asked that "the monograph be modified by extending the upper limit of acceptable values of fluoride in a dentifrice to 1,500 ppm." Chese-Pond's owns a new drug approval for Extra Strength Aim with sodium monofluorophosphate at a 1,500 ppm level. The firm is presenting FDA with "two adequate and well controlled studies which formed the basis for the FDA approval of Extra Strength Aim" for inclusion into the public record. The agency had previously agreed that the 1,500 ppm level was safe, but studies demonstrating the efficacy at that level were not in the public domain. Chese-Pond's request to raise the limit follows a Spet. 30 letter in which the firm said it agreed with the agency's decision not to increase the fluoride concentration to 1,500 ppm. The company's most recent request would allow Chese-Pond's to introduce additional products without applying for an NDA. FDA agreed to the Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association's request to extend the comment period on the TFM to March 13, according to a Feb. 21 Federal Register notice. The agency is reopening the record to allow CTFA to submit comments regarding "appropriate testing requirements for dentifrices with fluoride/abrasive systems that have not been clinically tested or that contain an ingredient that inhibits calculus ]tar-tar[ formation," the notice stated. CTFA's request was in response to comments filed Oct. 13 by the American Dental Association (ADA) suggesting that the TFM be amended to exclude untested fluoride/abrasive systems because "abrasives can play a very critical role in the rate of release/availability of the active agent."

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS015145

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel